Welcome to the SRP Forum! Please refer to the SRP Forum FAQ post if you have any questions regarding how the forum works.
AusMarkB
About
- Username
- AusMarkB
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,143
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Given that the labels on a radio button form part of the ctrlentid, for some properties at least, my gut feel is no
-
😁 I was wondering how far around the world it went
-
@Opto_Will my assumption is that if there is no password set, then the password field is simply ignored. Ignore me if that's essentially what you're saying
-
-
-
So, @DonBakke, you're saying, the brackets operator is more efficient that straight string concatenation? ReturnString[CharPos, LenString] = Category : @FM is more efficient than returnString := category:@FM Note, I'm clarifying not debating.
-
Chris, You could try this: Version = SRP_Get_FileVersion("SRPEditor.ocx") I haven't tested, but it might work for what you need.
-
Hey Chris, Kev has provided an extensive response to the message box issue via email. I'll forward it to you. In short, though, all good news.
-
* Yes * Not there * Have to get their IT to check that. that said, I dragged their data back and am debugging on my local. ... which is pretty much my standard procedure so don't know why I didn't just go there first?
-
:D all good Kev. I know the feeling. I often have big plans too and then get completely ignored. :)
-
Is it the copy that's failing or the attach? Wondering if the first time around, you're * copying from source to new. * Attaching new. Then, running a subsequent time. * copying from source to new with overwrite * attaching new - fail…
-
Thanks for clarifying. I just happened to notice ours was not correct and then stumbled over this and wondered if we were unknowingly breaking something.
-
@KevinFournier, email sent
-
Two thumbs up for @FrankTomeo's suggestion. That's the route I'd be going if I was you, especially with the new parse the whole thing requirements. Otherwise there'd be a bit of
-
Chances are someone else will provide exactly the answer you're looking for, but in the meantime, you might consider the use of SRP Array to make the job a little quicker. I'm thinking * Retrieve the array * Sort by the "Selected" column so th…
-
Have been a bit too busy to sort this out but I will try and organise a copy of a system and example for you this weekend. Due to the issue referred to in another thread, re the OI msg disabling windows and not re-enabling them, the new version turn…
-
I was hoping you were onto something re tab order so made the tab the first control. Alas no luck. I didn't really need to do anything to test it this time. I just opened the form on the second monitor and when it appeared in front of the window I a…
-
Excellent! A new release....
-
Hey Kev, Thanks. 4.2.2.2 has fixed this issue. Woohoo! Unfortunately, it led me to stumble over a different one. This new one was introduced somewhere between 4.2.1.1 and this one 4.2.2.2. In other words, it wasn't 4.2.2.2 explicitly. I know this …
-
Sorry Kev, Still happening and yes, OI9.4.4
-
Appreciate the effort Kevin. TBH, I'm not convinced there's any control that really fits the bill as more client requirements come to hand, but the scheduler is the one that seems to offer the closest fit. We'll push forward with that.
-
:) 4.2.1.1
-
9.4.4
-
Same scale. Same problem. .... just more in my face :D
-
Yes. 125% for laptop and 100% for secondary monitor
-
I've just updated to 4.2.1.1 and haven't yet tried any of the releases linked in this thread so maybe this has been addressed already but... This is a second monitor issue. If I open a form with a tabcontrol on my primary (laptop) monitor, then eve…
-
We're trying to let the users make changes at their own discretion, eg move an appointment. The problem with that is, we don't know when they've finished moving it. You could argue, they change the appointment and we retrieve the new start/end datet…
-
-
Sorry I don't have anything of an answer to offer other than to say this feels familiar. I've had clients before where a standard select would not pick up the records as expected and only a rebuild of the index would fix the problem. Note, no change…
-
Thanks Kev. Works a treat.