Welcome to the SRP Forum! Please refer to the SRP Forum FAQ post if you have any questions regarding how the forum works.
DonBakke
About
- Username
- DonBakke
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,057
- Last Active
- Roles
- Administrator
Comments
-
Vince, sorry. I don't think I read your original post correctly when I first responded. Your second post set me straight. I am able to duplicate the issue. Lock and Unlocking columns still leaves the record locked. You have to explicitly unlock the…
-
I don't know the underpinnings of RTI_Lock_Owner(), but I have no doubt that editors only look for record locks.
-
Maybe it is an old bug that will disappear with an upgrade to OI 10. Just tested. Sadly this is not the case.
-
I see. I thought you already came to the conclusion that this likely a problem with the compiler being overly zealous with the variable starting with the name of a keyword and this isn't anything on you. It just seems to be an unexpected (and unwant…
-
What specifically are you wondering about? You make some interesting observations (which were honestly a surprise to me) but somewhat par for the course with Revelation. I am not sure I caught the issue you are still puzzled about.
-
That should definitely help. In our early efforts to do what you are doing we discovered these "memory leaks" after running our code for extended periods of time. I think the sample code I included in this blog post does a proper release of each obj…
-
Stopping the event flow (aka stopping the event chain) is limited to the links associated to the currently running event. By "links", I'm referring to: * Script Event handler * Promoted Event handlers (pre system) * System Event handler * P…
-
Right. I agree with your expectations in principle but you do know that the SRP Editor relies upon Blint, which is the routine that the Revelation Editor uses to identify potential VNAVs, correct? We do a little post-analysis to clean up their findi…
-
So again...
-
Does this mean you do not need any help at this point?
-
I agree that there is a false positive being recorded on line 1516, but the OI editor is reporting the same false positive...correct?
-
I just want to commend you for creating a unit test for this!
-
That's a good question. I don't know if I have ever had that situation come up before. I think BASE_MFS should be updated to identify if the table is an alias and attempt to find the table commuter for the original name, but in the meantime you prob…
-
You don't need the "OLE.". Just use the eventname. Agreed, as long as we are only discussing the registering of OLE events. When interacting with properties or calling methods, we consider prepending with "OLE." to be best practice.
-
Could? Yes. Would? Probably not, but might consider if there was an intent to completely move away from O4W. O4W requires that you use RUN_OECGI_REQUEST. The HTTP Framework requires that you use HTTP_MCP. Thus you would need two different OEngineSe…
-
Why isn't this "Best practice" in your documentation? That is a fair question. For one, this only became best practice as of OI 9.x. Our controls have been around since OI 4 and we still have clients using OI 8 and our controls. Originally using A…
-
All the above are correct.
-
Your next level feat will be mastering transaction processing.
-
A guess this is a bittersweet conclusion. Regardless, I'm glad you solved your problem and you also, ironically, proved that OI works as expected.
-
I'm 99% certain it offers no performance benefits. It is really to isolate and protect the field being operated on. I think relational indexes use WriteV for this very purpose. Well, I have no other ideas to offer. This behavior is unexpected. Hone…
-
Does the editor also use WRITE.RECORD? I think a little explanation about the primitives is in order. Nothing uses these primitives in the way I think you are framing the question. Think of the primitives as event handlers for database transactio…
-
-
Nevermind...Kevin already responded while I was still typing out my response. :)
-
Jim - Kevin will provide the final word and correct me if I am wrong, but I think he misunderstood your question. As far as I know, our arithmetic services (e.g., ADD, SUBTRACT, MULTIPLY, and DIVIDE) will get around the limitation. As I recall, OI…
-
I should have thought to ask this at the beginning, you do have the Universal Driver properly installed and configured don't you? You have ServerOnly=1 in the REVPARAM file?
-
This is a known bug with OI 10.1 going to 10.2. If you recompile your forms with OLE controls it should go away.
-
Have you tested this on another table?
-
Hi Vince, I'm doing fine thanks! Have you tested this using Read / Write rather than ReadV / WriteV? Also, what if you use Read / WriteV? I have not used ReadV / WriteV extensively. However, I know they are called by RTP7 and RTP8 respectively and…