Welcome to the SRP Forum! Please refer to the SRP Forum FAQ post if you have any questions regarding how the forum works.
DonBakke
About
- Username
- DonBakke
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,091
- Last Active
- Roles
- Administrator
Comments
-
Anyone know what error ENG0805 means? Just a generic error or ? ENG0805: %3%, line %4%. Function %2% does not exist in dynamic link library %1%.
-
I think what you are asking is whether or not OI10 can use the same UD service that 09 is using. If so, the answer is yes they can use the same service and you do not need to do any other installation. The reason the question is confusing is because…
-
Barry - He is referring to the LH related DLLs. This was discussed earlier in this thread.
-
Do I need a separate install of UD for the OI10 install? I'm not following you with this question. Are you referring to a separate installation of the UD Service or are you asking about the client drivers?
-
Barry - They paid for the UD 5. Michael - It wouldn't hurt to try the ServerOnly=0 setting just to see what happens, but it does not solve the mystery, as I'm sure you are most eager to resolve.
-
Barry - If the revparam didn't change and OI10 launched before, I can't imagine this would be relevant to the issue. ServerOnly=0 is only necessary if you don't have UD5 running for OI9 and OI10. I believe Michael's client is using UD5.
-
I don't have any immediate ideas as to what went wrong. I concur with your conclusion that something has changed. If this was a problem with OI9, I might have thought that the LH.DLL itself was changed to a different version. But that DLL should not…
-
You stated that you ran the tool on the "main" app. I assume this is the app that sits just above SYSPROG? I also assume that you did not do any SYSPROG related migration?
-
Do you have problems logging in to OI10 for all applications, especially SYSPROG? If the revparam file was working just fine before the migration, did it get modified post-migration?
-
You have to create each and every app that needs to be migrated. You need to migrate in sequence, from the app closest to SYSPROG and then down the inheritance chain. Note: you cannot migrate SYSPROG itself. However, you very likely have entities i…
-
I'll also add that dong a scan is optional. Sometimes you'll learn more by doing a dry run of the migration and rely upon the error reports it generates. Each app is different, of course, so there is no one way to do it and often there is no way to …
-
No, you must run the SCAN_REP from OI9.
-
I'm not aware of OI making internet calls on its own. This is OI9 of course. OI10 will make calls, especially if you run it in dev mode.
-
Is the concern whether or not OI makes calls to the internet apart from developer code?
-
So clearing table 2 and 3 will trigger a rebuild? No. Everything in those tables is generate by the relational index. I would remove the relational indexes off of all tables. I would then clear Table 2 and Table 3. I would then add the indexes b…
-
It's hard to give you a definitive game plan without knowing details about these specific symbolics, the relational indexes, and the different tables. Does anything else populate rows in Table 2 and Table 3 other than the relational indexes? Does an…
-
Actually, building a relational index on a symbolic can be a powerful solution. It allows you to make conditional relational indexes. If @ANS = "", then no relation is created. But that is an academic issue, not terribly important to your query. Is…
-
@Opto_Will - To be honest, I'm surprised that you were allowed to paste into a protected cell. I've never seen that happen myself, but then again I don't rely on the OI EditTable that much. So on that note I think your expectations were right. ...h…
-
Simple answer from me is "no". The more elaborate answer is that I've heard of such utilities that can do this, but I don't think you can avoid doing this record-by-record. If you have a record split between the LK and OV, you will have to discern t…
-
This is in the Revelation Wiki: https://revelation.wiki/doku.php?id=guides:oi10:converter_quick_start
-
Jim - I'm glad that fixed the issue but the version you show in that Property dialog looks like it is a version behind. The reason the SRP Editor About window is better is because it will show you the internal version of the SRP Editor code and it w…
-
Jim - I'm thinking along the same lines as Barry. What do you see in the SRP Editor's About window?
-
Maybe Kevin will gift us with an update to the SRP PreCompiler to support that shorthand. :) If you do run into problems, I would be curious if swapping the order of the #pragma precompilers might help. This would allow the SRP PreCompiler to conve…
-
M@ - I don't know with any amount of certainty as I've never used that precompiler.
-
Version 3.4.8 is available through our Product site. I'm running an unreleased 3.4.9. Sooner or later you'll be upgrading so would you mind testing what's now available and letting us know if things have improved?
-
It won't be enabled by default because there haven't been any changes. If you edit the record, does the button become enabled?
-
Jim - Do you mean the button disappears or is not enabled?
-
I have never heard of a bogus frame size producing a GFE, but I wouldn't be surprised if that did happen. 110K framework seems outrageous to me. I even think a frame size of 24K is not great. General wisdom nowadays is to use 2,048K or 4,096K.
-
Michael, are you saying you do not have the RTI_SET_SIZELOCK form?
-
I thought you just wanted to know what the parameters are. I guess you really wanted documentation. This utility is available through the WORKS downloads. It does not have documentation on the routine itself, which is likely because it is meant to b…