Welcome to the SRP Forum! Please refer to the SRP Forum FAQ post if you have any questions regarding how the forum works.
DonBakke
About
- Username
- DonBakke
- Joined
- Visits
- 3,129
- Last Active
- Roles
- Administrator
Comments
-
Usually because they didn't run "As Administrator" first.
-
Sweet! Yes, we have encouraged people to roll out their own implementation of a multi-select feature with the SRP EditTable, but few are willing to put in the effort to make it work. I'm pleased to hear that you found a way.
-
Correct, the SRP EditTable does not support multi-select.
-
In general, it appears you've done what is required. Are you sure your URLs are resolving themselves to point to OECGI3.exe and OECGI4.exe as needed? Are you using Rewrite Rules for the OECGI3.exe URLs?
-
I see. What does your registry entry for OECGI3 look like? Is RUN_OECGI_REQUEST configured in that entry?
-
Have you reviewed the server preparation list from the online docs?
-
I think Mark is seeing this error being returned from the SRP Mail Utility. I don't know if -99 is coming from the SMTP server or from within the SRPMail.dll itself. I was waiting for Kevin to respond since he knows the internal code better.
-
We are still looking into this issue but we have a better understanding of the problem. It seems that the form which launched the dialog is not getting activated when the dialog is closed, so the promoted ACTIVATED event handler does not turn F9 bac…
-
Hi Anton, We've duplicated the issue and are currently working to resolve. We'll respond ASAP when we have a solution.
-
Ah...okay. So you have returned control back to the original form, which I assume is an MDI child. F9 doesn't work but F8 does. Do you have a save button in the ribbon control? Does it work?
-
Hello Anton. I believe what you are reporting is that the normal save key (F9) isn't working while the DatePicker dialog is displayed. Correct? I'll comment further assuming that this is the issue you are dealing with and perhaps offer some thoughts…
-
Is that what you would suggest, even for larger amounts of data? Yes, this is what I would suggest but I really don't know how you intend to use this so I can't impose strict standards. However, when you look at examples of how JSON is typically u…
-
Matt - I'm excited to see you using and enjoying SRP_JSON. This has been a valuable part of our web services product (SRP HTTP Framework) but I have also been migrating a lot of non-web utilities to use JSON as well. I am just finding that wrapping …
-
Are you going to be maintaining both 64-bit and 32-bit versions of the SRP controls, going forward? I posted my previous response before I saw this question. However, my response is relevant to this question as well. The term "maintaining" is subj…
-
Just to avoid a barrage of questions that might come up from anyone who is reading this thread, we are seriously looking at the pathway toward 64-bit for our products. We do recognize the importance of providing a solution for our customers and clie…
-
I don't think it was anything I said LOL. You don't come close to the polemic expressiveness of other members in our community. :) I actually did have that very problem earlier today, but it was from a browser session that was not logged in. So I…
-
YMMV, of course, but I would certainly try it first to see how well it might work. Definitely presize the dummy tables to be larger than you need and then sizelock them to prevent dynamic sizing. That will give you optimum speed in the copying proce…
-
What about creating dummy tables in AREV 3.12 to port the Rev/G data into first and then attach these in OI/ARev32 and copy the data into their final destination? You don't even have to create dictionaries for these dummy tables. They are simply the…
-
Sorry for the spam...but another thought occurred to me. I'll bet these tables, and the REVMEDIA file, were created with 32-bit headers. Thus, AREV 3.12 will never be able to access them.
-
One more thing to try...if the OI/ARev32 tables are nicely contained in the same folder, temporarily move this folder to underneath the AREV32 system and attempt to attach them there. If that works, do what you gotta do to move the Rev/G data over a…
-
I'm not sure what a WORKS subscription has to do with getting professional help. You can hire a company like us, Sprezz, or whoever, to connect in and check things out without a subscription. Unless you bid this at a fixed cost, your client would b…
-
So, getting professional help with this is not an option? If it will save you days of work I think it would be well worth it.
-
If the XP box can map a drive to the server and see the files I would not think that this alone is the problem. Lots of people, unfortunately, are still using XP workstations running networked copies of AREV and OI.
-
If AREV 3.12 already has the Universal network type then you don't need to run an installer. But, yes, there was an installer to load this network driver in AREV 3.12 for systems that never had it to begin with. Well, I don't know why you can't see…
-
I see. I didn't realize you already have OI/ARev32 tables in place. So you are trying to use AREV 3.12 as the man-in-the-middle that will take information from Rev/G and migrate it to OI/ARev32. When I suggested using AREV 3.12, I had envisioned th…
-
I think what is confusing me is that I get the impression that you have only pointed a volume to the Rev/G files in AREV 3.12 but you have not actually converted the tables into LH. Therefore, nothing has changed in a way that would make OI/AREV32 h…
-
I'm confused. Are you saying AREV 3.12 is unable to read the volume's media map or OI/ARev32?
-
No problem. I just wanted to make sure I gave you an answer that was best suited to the immediate target. I think if this were my project I would dust off an actual copy of AREV, use the ROS bond that works, and any other tools to port the the Rev/…
-
You never answered my question as to the target destination of this system. Is this ultimately going to ARev32 to live indefinitely or is this being moved into OI?
-
How is OnClick made asynchronous? By default all OLE events are asynchronous, but the QUALIFY_EVENT message can be configured to make an event synchronous. Check the synchronous flag docs for the OLE event.